Skip to Main Content

Building Resilience to Misinformation: An Instructional Toolkit

A toolkit to assist teaching faculty in engaging students on the topic of misinformation or disinformation.

What Is In This Section?

This section contains all of the Resources, Additional Tools, and Recommended Readings from all three of the modules.

Resources

Agarwal, N. K., & Alsaeedi, F. (2021). Creation, dissemination and mitigation: toward a disinformation behavior framework and model. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 73(5), 639-658.​

Bailey, T. C., & Hsieh-Yee, I. (2020). Combating the sharing of false information: History, framework, and literacy strategies. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 24(1-2), 9-30.​

Cooke, N. A. (2018). Fake News and Alternative Facts: Information Literacy in a Post-Truth Era. American Library Association.​

Kim, S. (2017). Social media algorithms: why you see what you see. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(1), 147-154. ​

Lewandowsky, S., & Van Der Linden, S. (2021). Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 348-384.​

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward and interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe.​

Agarwal, N. K., & Alsaeedi, F. (2020). Understanding and fighting disinformation and fake news: Towards an innovation behavior framework. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 57(1), 1-4.​

Butter, M. (2014). Plots, Designs, and Schemes: American Conspiracy Theories from the Puritans to the Present. De Gruyter: Germany.​

Bliss, N., Bradley, E., Garland, J., Menczer, F., Ruston, S., Starbird, K., & Wiggins, C. (2020). An Agenda for Disinformation Research. A Computing Community Consortium (CCC) Quadrennial Paperhttps://cra.org/ccc/resources/ccc-led-whitepapers/#2020-quadrennial-papers. ​

Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inocluation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS ONE, 12(5), 1-21.​

Cook, J. (March 31, 2020). A history of FLICC: the 5 techniques of science denial. Skeptical Science. Retrieved from https://skepticalscience.com/history-FLICC-5-techniques-science-denial.html. ​

Cooke, N. A. (2018). Fake News and Alternative Facts: Information Literacy in a Post-Truth Era. American Library Association.​

Ditzkies, P. (2018, March 8). Study: On Twitter, false news travels faster than true stories. MIT News. Retrieved from https://news.mit.edu/2018/study-twitter-false-news-travels-faster-true-stories-0308. ​

Farrell, J., McConnell, K., & Brulle, R. (2019). Evidence-based strategies to combat scientific misinformation. Nature Climate Change, 9(3), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0368-6.​

Johnson, J. H., & Gluck, M. (2016). Everydata: The Misinformation Hidden in the Little Data You Consume Every Day. Bibliomotion, Inc.: New York, New York.​

Kavanagh, J., & Rich, M. D. (2018). Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation.​

Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Ecker, U. K. H., Albarracín, D., Amazeen, M. A., Kendeou, P., Lombardi, D., Newman, E. J., Pennycook, G., Porter, E. Rand, D. G., Rapp, D. N., Reifler, J., Roozenbeek, J., Schmid, P., Seifert, C. M., Sinatra, G. M., Swire-Thompson, B., van der ​

Liu, H. (2022, October 14). Disinformation. In Encyclopediahttps://encyclopedia.pub/entry/29164. ​

Linden, S., Vraga, E. K., Wood, T. J., Zaragoza, M. S. (2020). The Debunking Handbook 2020. Retrieved from https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/DebunkingHandbook2020.pdf. ​

Nuccitelli, D. (2013, September 16). The 5 stages of climate denial are on display ahead of the IPCC report. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/sep/16/climate-change-contrarians-5-stages-denial. ​

Robinson, D. J. (2021, May 31). How Big Tobacco Set the Stage for Fake Nws. The Walrus. Retrieved from https://thewalrus.ca/how-big-tobacco-set-the-stage-for-fake-news/. ​

Swift, J. (1710). The Art of Political Lying. The Examiner. Retrieved from https://www.bartleby.com/209/633.html. ​

University of Oxford. (2021, January 13). Social media manipulation by political actors an industrial scale problem – Oxford report. University of Oxford – News and Events. Retrieved from https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-01-13-social-media-manipulation-political-actors-industrial-scale-problem-oxford-report. ​

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 359(6380), 1146–1151.​

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward and interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe.​

Agarwal, N. K., & Alsaeedi, F. (2020). Understanding and fighting disinformation and fake news: Towards an information behavior framework. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.327. ​

Bailey, T. C., & Hsieh-Yee, I. (2019). Combating the Sharing of False Information: History, Framework, and Literacy Strategies. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 24(1-2), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2020.1863286. ​

Belief. (n.d.). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved December 16, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/behavior .​

Behaviour. (n.d.). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved December 16, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/behavior .​

Clarke, J., Proudfoot, J., Vatiliotis, V., Verge, C., Holmes-Walker, D. J., Campbell, L., Wilhelm, K., Moravac, C., Indu, P. S., Bridgett, M. (2018). Attitudes towards mental health, mental health research, and digital interventions by young adults with type 1 diabetes: A qualitative analysis. Health Expectations, 21(3), 668-677. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12662. ​

Cooke, N. A. (2018). Fake News and Alternative Facts: Information Literacy in a Post-Truth Era. American Public Library Association.​

European Commission (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformationhttps://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/final-report-high-level-expert-group-fake-news-and-online-disinformation. ​

Guarda, R. F., Ohlson, M. P., Romanini, A. V. (2018). Disinformation, dystopia, and post-reality in social media: A semiotic-cognitive perspective. Education for Information, 34(3), 185-197.  https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180209. ​

Khan, M. L., & Idris, I. K. (2019). Recognise misinformation and verify before sharing: a reasoned action and information literacy perspective. Behaviour and Information Technology, 38(12), 1194-1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1578828. ​

Martzoukou, K. (2020). Academic libraries in COVID-19: A renewed mission for digital literacy. Library Management, 42(4/5), 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-09-2020-0131. ​

McQuail, D., & Deuze, M. (2020). McQuail's Media and Mass Communication Theory (7th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.​

Nygren, T., & Guath, M. (2021). Students Evaluating and Corroborating Digital News. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1897876. ​

Prentice, D. A. (1987). Psychological Correspondence of Possessions, Attitudes, and Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 993-1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.993. ​

Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes and Values: A Theory of Organization and Change. Jossey-Bass Inc.​

Scheibenzuber, C., Hofer, S., & Nistor, N. (2021). Designing for fake news literacy training: A problem-based undergraduate course. Computers in Human Behaviour, 121, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106796. ​

Tandoc Jr., E. C., Lim, Z. W., Ling, R. (2018). Defining "Fake News": A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143. ​

Tay, Q. L., Hurlstone, M. J., Kurz, T., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2022). A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation. The British Psychological Society, 113(3), 591-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12551. ​

University of Calgary Libraries and Cultural Resources. (2018). Primary Sources. Research Guides. https://libguides.ucalgary.ca/guides/primarysources. ​

University of Calgary Libraries and Cultural Resources. (n.d.). High School Classes. Research Guides. https://libguides.ucalgary.ca/guides/highschool/scholarly-sources. ​

University of Toronto Libraries. (n.d.). UTSC Finding Primary Sources. University of Toronto. https://guides.library.utoronto.ca/c.php?g=250552&p=1671079. ​

University of Toronto Libraries. (n.d.). What are secondary sources? University of Toronto. https://onesearch.library.utoronto.ca/faq/what-are-secondary-sources. ​

University of Toronto Libraries. (n.d.). What counts as a scholarly source? University of Toronto. https://onesearch.library.utoronto.ca/faq/what-counts-scholarly-source. ​

University of Toronto Libraries. (n.d.). What's the difference between scholarly and peer-reviewed articles? University of Toronto. Retrieved from https://onesearch.library.utoronto.ca/faq/whats-difference-between-scholarly-and-peer-reviewed-articles. ​

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward and interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe.​

Zerback, T., Töpfl, F., & Knöpfle, M. (2021). The disconcerting potential of online disinformation: Persuasive effects of astroturfing comments and three strategies for inoculation against them. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1080-1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820908530.

Additional Tools and Recommended Readings

Breaking Harmony Square: Users are able to play as a ‘Chief Disinformation Officer’ and are tasked with operating an online disinformation campaign. ​ 

Edelman Trust Barometer 2023: Based on a trust and credibility survey, this report helps readers understand forces that lead to polarization, trust (and distrust) in various institutions, and more (Edelman Trust Institute).. 

FactCheck.org: Specializing in fact-checking. Operated by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. (UPenn)​ 

FLICC: The 5 Techniques of Science Denial: A breakdown of the five most prominent denial techniques from John Cook, an assistant professor at George Mason University specializing in misinformation about climate change.​ 

Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review: A peer-reviewed, scholarly publication that 'fast-reviews' content from misinformation scientists and scholars. (U of T)​ 

International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN): Includes a list of media corporations that are verified signatories to the IFCN's code of principles.​ 

Logical Fallacies: Linking to Purdue University's Online Writing Lab, this webpage discusses different variations of logical fallacies, such as a red herring, straw man, either/or, and more. 

Politifact: A fact-checking website operated by the Poynter Institute. Specializes in fact-checking, media literacy and journalism ethics training. (UPenn)​ 

Snopes: Snopes.com is an online fact-checking website that also posts articles that fact-check popular news stories. (U of T)​ 

Thinking Is Power: Geared towards helping students and other users develop skills in critical thinking and information and science literacy, Thinking Is Power offers many resources, including literacy courses, a toolkit, and informative games, that students can take home and use at their convenience.

Ulrichsweb: A site that helps identify if a source is an  Academic/Scholarly source or a Consumer (non-scholarly) source. (UBC) 

The Washington Post Fact Checker: A section of The Washington Post's website dedicated to fact-checking relevant news stories and uncovering 'The Truth Behind The Rhetoric.' (UPenn)​.

Bailey, T. C., & Hsieh-Yee, I. (2019). Combating the Sharing of False Information: History, Framework, and Literacy Strategies. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 24(1-2), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2020.1863286. ​

Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2020). Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review. Social Sciences, 9(10), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100185. ​

Boucher, J. C., Edwards, J., Kim, J., Badami, A., & Smith, H. (2022). Disinformation and Russia-Ukrainian War on Canadian Social Media. The School of Public Polciy Publications, 15(1), 1-10.​

Cook, J., Ellerton, P., & Kinkead, D. (2018). Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors. Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), 1-7.​

Cook, J., Supran, G., Lewandowsky, S., Oreskes, N., & Maibach, E. (2019). America Misled: How the fossil fuel industry deliberately misled Americans about climate change. Retrieved from https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/America_Misled.pdf. ​

Elmansy, R. (2016, January 15). 6 Steps for Effective Critical Thinking. Designorate. https://www.designorate.com/steps-effective-critical-thinking/.​

Entergy. (2018, May 10). Entry Completes Internal Investigation Regarding New Orleans Power Station Advocacy. Retrieved from https://www.entergynewsroom.com/news/entergy-completes-internal-investigation-regarding-new-orleans-power-station-advocacy/. ​

Grimes, D. R. (2017, June 14). Russian fake news is not new: Soviet Aids propaganda costs countless lives. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2017/jun/14/russian-fake-news-is-not-new-soviet-aids-propaganda-cost-countless-lives

Grimes, D. R. (2022, March 28). Russian Misinformation Seeks to Confound, Not Convince. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/russian-misinformation-seeks-to-confound-not-convince/. ​

Harold, S. W., Beauchamp-Mustafaga, N., & Hornung, J. W. (2021). Chinese Disinformation Efforts on Social Media. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation.​

Holoyda, B. (2023, March 29). QAnon. Encyclopedia Britannicahttps://www.britannica.com/topic/QAnon

Kiili, C., Coiro, J., & Räikkönen, E. (2019). Students’ evaluation of information during online inquiry: Working individually or in pairs. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 42(3), 167-183. 

Lewandowsky, S., & Cook, J. (2020). The Conspiracy Theory Handbook. Retrieved from https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ConspiracyTheoryHandbook.pdf

McKee, M. (2017). The Tobacco Industry: The Pioneer of Fake News. Journal of Public Health Research, 6(1), 878.​

Miler, H. (2021, March 29). Russia's Anti-Vaccine Propaganda is Tantamount to a Declaration of War. Pacific Research Institute: Centre for Medical Economics and Innovation. Retrieved from https://medecon.org/russias-anti-vaccine-propaganda-is-tantamount-to-a-declaration-of-war/. ​

Silver, N. A., Kierstead, E. C., Briggs, J., Schillo, B. (2022). Charming e-cigarette users with distorted science: A survey examining social media platform use, nicotine-related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industry.  BMJ Open, 12(6), n.p.​

Sidani, J. E., Hoffman, B. L., Colditz, J. B., Melcher, E., Taneja, S. B., Shensa, A., Primack, B., Davis, E., & Chu, K. H.  (2022). E-Cigarette-Related Nicotine Misinformation on Social Media. Substance Use and Misuse, 57(4), 588-594.​

Singh,R., & Brinster, K. N. (2021). Fighting Fake News: The Cognitive Factors Impeding Political Information Literacy. In N. G. Taylor, K. Kettnich, U. Gorham, & P. T. Jaegar (Eds.), Libraries and the Global Retreat of Democracy: Confronting Polarization, Misinformation, and Suppression (pp. 109-131). Bingley, England: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0065-283020210000050005. ​

Stein, M. I. (2018, May 4). Actors were paid to support Entergy's power plant at New Orleans City Council meetings. The Lens. Retrieved from https://thelensnola.org/2018/05/04/actors-were-paid-to-support-entergys-power-plant-at-new-orleans-city-council-meetings/. ​

University of Calgary Research Guides – Primary Sources: This Research Guide from the University of Calgary provides information on primary sources for students, such as examples, how to evaluate primary resources, and more. ​

U of L Libraries – Citizen Literacy: This online toolkit from University of Louisville Libraries has six separate modules with helpful tools for students, including Lateral Reading and Evaluating Expertise, among others. ​

University of Louisville. (2023). Paul-Elder Critical Thinking Framework – University of Louisville Ideas to Action. Retrieved from https://louisville.edu/ideastoaction/about/criticalthinking/framework. ​

Yablokov, I. (2022). Russian disinformation finds fertile ground in the West. Nature, 6, 766-767.