Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Systematic Reviews in the Health Sciences

A guide to systematic and other types of reviews in the health sciences. Also describes the types of support available to systematic review teams through the Health Sciences Library

Getting Started: What You Need

The Institute of Medicine's (IOM) Standards for Systematic Reviews make it clear that several things should be in place before you begin. These include:

A multidisciplinary team - at minimum:

  • One or more experts in systematic review methodology (risk of bias, study design, data analysis)
  • A librarian or information specialist trained in systematic searching of the literature.  
  • One or more clinical content experts

Balance on the team is important - as the IOM standards note (pp. 48-49): " teams that are too dominated by clinical content experts are more likely to hold preconceived opinions related to the topic of the SR, spend less time conducting the review, and produce lower quality SRs."

A good topic/question

  • Make sure there isn't already another systematic review that addresses your question. You can search the Cochrane Database and PROSPERO for protocols of systematic reviews in progress. 
  • Spend some time identifying key concepts, inclusion/exclusion criteria. 
  • Think about whether your project is better suited to a different type of review.

A realistic time frame
A well-conducted, rigorous systematic review takes as much time as any other well conducted study. A recent analysis of published reviews found that the mean amount of time between publication of the protocol and publication of the finished review was 67.3 weeks, and that funded reviews (which are presumably conducted to a higher standard) took longer than unfunded ones.

A protocol
Like any well-designed research study, a systematic review should include a protocol that describes in detail the objectives and methods of the review. If you're working on a Cochrane Review, you can search the Cochrane Database for examples of protocols. Another resource for protocol examples is the protocol registry PROSPERO. Developing and registering a protocol will also let others know that a systematic review on this topic is underway.

A systematic search

What is searched depends on the topic of the review but should include searches in several literature databases, as well as an attempt to identify relevant unpublished studies and grey literature.

A literature management system

You will need a literature/citation management system like EndNote or Mendeley to handle the large number of references turned up by your search. EndNote can be purchased through the U of C bookstore.