Academic Publishing Demystified
What is a predatory publisher?
In recent years, the number of exploitative predatory publishers (and conferences) has grown. These publishers typically send unsolicited invitations to authors offering to publish their research for a fee; however, they do not offer any of the traditional services provided by reputable publishers or conferences, such as editing, peer-review, archiving and marketing. They may also solicit researchers to sit on their editorial boards, or graduate students to publish theses or dissertations.
Predatory conferences operate similarly, soliciting scholars to submit materials to conferences that are organized solely for profit. These conferences may be poorly organized and typically do not offer peer review, or they may not actually take place at all.
It is important for all academic authors to be aware of these predatory entities, as trying to withdraw submitted materials once they've been submitted is usually very difficult.
This page offers resources, such as checklists and guides, to help authors evaluate publishers and conference organizers. Remember, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!
Bottom line: if you receive an unsolicited request from an unfamiliar source, proceed with extreme caution. If you're at all unsure, please contact a librarian for assistance.
A consensus definition of predatory publishing established in 2019:
"Predatory journals and publishers are entities that prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship and are characterized by false or misleading information, deviation from best editorial and publication practices, a lack of transparency, and/or the use of aggressive and indiscriminate solicitation practices." (Grudniewicz et al., 2019)
Predatory publishers
- Transcript - Predatory publishersDownload video transcript as a .txt file
Tools for evaluating the reputability of publishers
If you are uncertain of the quality or credibility of a journal or publisher, here are a few things to investigate:
- Review past issues of the journal. Is the writing and research of good quality, is it relevant to the aims and scope of the journal, and has it been copy edited adequately?
- Does the journal have a clear and appropriate scope?
- Are editorial board members clearly listed, recognized subject experts, and is their current contact information listed?
- Is the peer review process employed by the journal clearly described?
- Are author fees (e.g. article processing charges, colour charges, page charges) clearly and transparently described?
- Are any impact metrics (e.g. impact factor) listed by the journal recognized and reputable? Predatory publishers often list bogus or made-up impact metrics. Check with a librarian if you're not sure.
For more information:
- Think. Check. SubmitWhether you are submitting to an Open Access publication or a commercial one, it can be difficult finding guidance on where to publish. This site provides excellent checklists for both books and journals to help authors evaluate the reputability of any given publication.
- Salient characteristics of potential predatory journalsAn evidence based list based on a cross-sectional comparison of characteristics of potential predatory, legitimate open access, and legitimate subscription-based biomedical journals. From Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Maduekwe, O. et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Med 15, 28 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9
- How to assess a journal (A.K.A. How not to publish in an undesirable journal)A simple, one-page guide that outlines key things to consider when assessing a journal.
- Evaluating journalsA guide with comprehensive information on how to evaluate journals, from the American Library Association.
- Directory of Open Access JournalsDOAJ is an online directory that indexes and provides access to quality open access, peer-reviewed journals. If the journal you are considering is not listed here, you may want to investigate further to ensure it is a quality publication.
- Journal Evaluation ToolA rubric that helps authors evaluate journals, and gives them a low/med/high score.
For graduate students: Be skeptical of publishers who approach you to express interest in publishing your recently completed thesis or dissertation. These publishers are essentially a print-on-demand vanity publisher. While you will not have to pay a fee, you are unlikely to ever receive anything from the publisher.
More importantly, you will have transferred your copyright to this publisher and therefore will be unable to publish your work with legitimate publishers in future.
Licensing
Unless otherwise noted, content is this guide is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Last Updated: Jun 4, 2024 12:03 PM
- URL: https://libguides.ucalgary.ca/publishing
- Print Page